Claims workbench/CLM-2026-015083
Professional claim · CMS-1500 · Provider portal

CLM-2026-015083

Mesa Internal Medicine Associates, Internal Medicine. Service 2025-12-05 at office (POS 11). Received 2026-01-03.

Needs review
Billed
$563.00
2 lines
Allowed
$349.06
if approved
Plan pays
—
Needs review
Member owes
—
copay / deductible / 30% coinsurance
Rules engine
Review
CO97
Decided by
Nobody yet
open

Member

Resolved through the identity graph

Member ID
UHC-79108-37
Date of birth
1945-04-19
Identity
Verified3 records, confidence 0.99
Claim record
CLMCLM-423267
Relationship
Spouse, Scottsdale, AZ

Coverage and accumulators

Found by member ID

Plan
CHOICE-PLUS-PPO PPO group GRP-4585
Coverage period
2024-12-01 to present
Deductible
$938.12 of $1,500.0063%
Out-of-pocket maximum
$2,023.07 of $4,500.0045%
Copays
office $25.00, specialist $50.00, emergency $350.00
Physical therapy visits
15 of 20 used

Provider

Billing and rendering

Billing provider
Mesa Internal Medicine Associates
Internal Medicine · taxonomy 207R00000X
NPI
4707375216
Network
In network
Rendering NPI
2155982814
Location
Los Angeles, CA · TIN 98-0064995
Authorisation / referral
none / none

Service lines

CMS-1500: procedures, modifiers, units, charges and the pricing outcome per line

LineCodeDescriptionMod.UnitsDxBilledAllowedMemberPlanLine status
199214Office visit, established patient, moderate complexity5911$264.00$163.68——Review
299215Office visit, established patient, high complexity5911,2$299.00$185.38——Review
Totals$563.00$349.06——
Diagnoses (ICD-10-CM)
  • 1. I10 Essential (primary) hypertensionprincipal
  • 2. E11.65 Type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia
Claim header
Patient account
PA-355910
Frequency code
1 (original)
Accident
No
DRG
—
Admit / discharge
—
Landed
2026-10-22 12:44

Rules engine

CLAIMS-ADJ v1: 11 checks, 1 needing attention

CheckResultCodeDetail
Member identityPassAttached to MBR-000785 (verified, link confidence 0.99).
EligibilityPassActive on 2025-12-05: CHOICE-PLUS-PPO (PPO), effective 2024-12-01.
Timely filingPassReceived 29 days after service (limit 90).
Duplicate checkPassNo matching prior claim in the duplicate window.
Prior authorisationPassNo line requires precertification.
Provider networkPassIn-network provider Mesa Internal Medicine Associates (4707375216).
Medical necessityPassDiagnosis supports the procedures billed.
Bundling (NCCI)ReviewCO97Modifier 59 used on a normally bundled code pair; the operative note must document a distinct procedural service.
Benefit included in another service already adjudicated
Benefit limitsPassNo limited benefit on this claim.
CompletenessPassRequired documentation present.
High-dollar reviewPassWithin the auto-adjudication ceiling.
Evaluated 2026-10-22 12:44 under policy version 1. Left for review: soft signals only, no hard rule fired.

Notes

Provider, system and examiner notes on this claim

  • ClinicalProvider: Mesa Internal Medicine Associates2025-12-05 11:16

    Patient seen for essential (primary) hypertension. Separate procedure performed at a distinct anatomical site during the same encounter; see operative note for site detail.

  • SystemSystem: Claims system2026-01-03 03:43

    NCCI edit: modifier 59 used on a code pair that is normally bundled. Operative note requested.

Attachments

Documents received with the claim

  • Medical recordrecords_PA-355910.pdf7 pages

    Operative note describing procedures at two distinct anatomical sites.

Claim history

Every event on this claim, sealed in the audit chain

  1. Rules engineReview2026-10-22 12:44
    Bundling (NCCI): Modifier 59 used on a normally bundled code pair; the operative note must document a distinct procedural service.
  2. AI recommendationApproved2026-10-22 12:49
    The claim is for an office visit with a member who is eligible and in coverage. The provider is in-network, and the service is medically necessary. The use of modifier 59 is justified by the clinical note and operative note, which document procedures at distinct anatomical sites. The claim is within the auto-adjudication ceiling and does not require prior authorization. All required documentation is present, and there are no benefit limits or duplicate issues.
  3. AI recommendation recordedR. Patel (Claims Examiner II)2026-10-21 14:05 · 406b72af
  4. AI recommendation recordedR. Patel (Claims Examiner II)2026-10-22 12:49 · 9e375b71

Other claims for this member

Same resolved identity

ClaimServiceProviderBilledStatus
CLM-2026-0314562026-05-12Desert Rehabilitation Center$321.00Approved

AI recommendation

apac.amazon.nova-pro-v1:0 · prompt adjudicate-v1 · policy v1 · assist mode

Approvedconfidence 0.95 Validated

The claim is for an office visit with a member who is eligible and in coverage. The provider is in-network, and the service is medically necessary. The use of modifier 59 is justified by the clinical note and operative note, which document procedures at distinct anatomical sites. The claim is within the auto-adjudication ceiling and does not require prior authorization. All required documentation is present, and there are no benefit limits or duplicate issues.

Evidence cited: [C][DX][L1][L2][PRV][IDN][COV][R-identity][R-eligibility][R-timely_filing][R-duplicate][R-prior_auth][R-network][R-clinical_edit][R-ncci][R-benefit_limit][R-completeness][R-high_dollar][N1][N2][A1]
Latency
1,851 ms
Tokens
1,282 in / 238 out
Cost
$0.0018
Input hash a8a6d313e0e5a98c… · identifiers withheld from the model: name, dob, member_id

Examiner decision

Record the final decision; pricing and remittance reasons follow from it

Pre-filled from the AI recommendation. Change anything before you record it.
Outcome
512 characters
ExaminerR. Patel (Claims Examiner II)
Will apply: approve

Evaluation truth

Hidden label from the synthetic generator; never shown to the model

Approvedscenario: Unbundling supported

Modifier 59 supported: distinct anatomical site documented.